Will this Ganga manthan help the River?

Uma Bharti at GM

The one day Ganga Manthan[1] organized by the National Mission for Clean Ganga on July 7, 2014 was described by Union Minister[2] Sushri Uma Bharti & Union Minister[3] Shri Nitin Gadkari as “Historical”. The Union Environment Minister, who has one of the most crucial role in achieving a rejuvenated Ganga, was supposed to be there, but could not come at any stage.

I attended the full day meeting with a lingering question: Will this help the river? Even some of the ardent skeptics said that Uma ji has emotional, spiritual and religious attachment with the cause of Ganga.

At the conclave attended by close to a thousand people, the story of how Ms. Bharti came back to the BJP party about a year back to work for the cause of Ganga, and how she was promised a year back that if their party came to power, Ganga will get a separate ministry and she its charge was narrated repeatedly by both Ms Bharti and Mr Gadkari at least twice. It was also stated that the government has the commitment, the will & all the money to make the Ganga clean (Nirmal) and perennial (aviral). There were  also repeated statements by both ministers about the officials being so committed to the cause of Ganga. These, in essence, were the basic positive assets of this government to achieve Ganga Rejuvenation.

While it was good to see large gathering involving various sections of the society, including many independent non government voices, missing were some key stakeholders: Ganga basin state governments, farmers groups, Ministry of Urban Development, fisher-folk groups, boats-people representatives. Another key constituency missing was Ministry of Agriculture, since agriculture is major user of water & irrigation and responsible for water diversion and at the same time major non point source polluter through use of chemicals and fertilizers.

Rejuvenation does not mean just nirmal and aviral But if the task is Rejuvenation of River Ganga, are these assets sufficient? What exactly does Rejuvenation of River Ganga mean? There were no answers to this question at the meeting. The government did not even seem bothered about these questions. Are Nirmal and Aviral Ganga sufficient objectives to achieve Rejuvenation of Ganga? The answer is clearly no, for, even a pipleline or canal carrying perennial flow of water can claim that distinction. A rejuvenated river will need much more than that, but the government has nothing else to offer for a rejuvenated river.

Even for Aviral Ganga, the government had absolutely nothing to offer. In the information package shared with the participants, the only thing relevant to Aviral Ganga was the extended summary of draft “Ganga River Basin Management Plan” being prepared by consortium of seven IITs in collaboration with some 11 other organisations. This is led by Dr Vinod Tare of IIT Kanpur. While standing with Dr Tare and Rajendra Singh of Tarun Bharat Sangh at the lunch, I said, the problem with Ganga is not of technology[4], but of governance. Despite being a proud IITian myself, I have no hesitation in saying that IITs do not have expertise in governance issues, so how can the IIT Consortium help in fix a governance problem? Having read the full Draft Plan of the IIT consortium, it only further strengthens the view that it was wrong decision of Jairam Ramesh to give this task to IIT Consortium.

Agenda for further destruction As a matter of fact, while this government has yet to take a step that will truly help rejuvenation of Ganga, they have declared their agenda that will possibly further destroy the river. This was clear on June 6, 2014, within ten days of new government taking over when a PIB press release[5] announced, “Shri Gadkari said it is proposed to conduct dredging to provide a width of 45 meters and for a three (3) meters draft (depth) to enable transport of passengers and goods between Varanasi and Hoogly on river Ganga in the first stage of its development and eleven terminals are proposed to be constructed along the banks. He said barrages are proposed to be constructed at every 100 Kms.” This was a shocking and arrogant announcement. There is nothing in public domain about this Rs 6000 crores plan, no details as to what exactly is planned, where the barrages are planned, why are they needed, what are their environmental impacts, what are the social impacts, what are the riverine impacts, what is the cost and benefits, who will pay the costs and who will reap the benefits, where is public consultation….there is absolutely nothing in public domain and here is a nine day old government declaring such massive plan! By July 7, 2014, the PIB Press Release declared that the depth will now by 5 meters and not three announced earlier. The PIB PR now said, “He (Mr Gadkari) said barrages are proposed to be constructed at every 100 Kms on the river. Shri Gadkari said his Ministry has sent a proposal in this regard to World Bank for the development of Allahabad- Haldia corridor.”

The minister possibly does not know that there is just one barrage on the Allahabad-Haldia 1500 km long stretch, namely the Farakka barrage and Bangladesh had threatened India to take the matter about building this barrage to the UN! Moreover, that barrage, everyone accepts, has not even achieved the basic objective it was supposed to achieve, namely navigability of Kolkata port, but has had many other severe impacts.

Nitin Gadkari at GM

At Ganga Manthan, Mr Gadkari dropped a bombshell[6] when he said this plan is already in advanced stage of appraisal with the World Bank! He said the government hopes to get Rs 4000 crores from the World Bank!! The World Bank has zero track record in achieving any clean river anywhere in the world, after spending billions of dollars every year. In India itself it stands guilty of destroying many rivers. A more inauspicious start to the Ganga Manthan possibly could not have been possible. At the Ganga Manthan itself, there was opposition to this plan, as The Hindu[7] has reported.But Ms Uma Bharti finds nothing amiss about this as was clear by her answers at the press conference. But what about at least some semblance of participatory democracy?

Business as usual at NMCG and NGBRA will not help In reality, this is not all. While this Manthan for Ganga Rejuvenation is happening, the NMCG and NGBRA[8] (National Ganga River Basin Authority) go on with their work in business as usual fashion. So in Varanasi, the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam is going about its task of floating and examining the bids for five-part sewer laying and Sewage Treatment Plants with the help of JICA money. In Kanpur, the effort to divert several streams to Pandu is going on. In Allahabad, “the draft final ESAMP sewerage works for sewerage districts” A & C could be found on the NGBRA website. In Patna, the World Bank is funding the sewerage projects of Pahari in Patna & river front development and the draft social and environmental impact assessments could be found on NGBRA website. All of this (except the Varanasi packages, which are funded by Japanese aid agency) is going on under USD 1 Billion World Bank Funded NBGRA project.

So the business as usual that is going on for 40 years is now going to help rejuvenate Ganga!

The NMCG announced that the Manthan, a “National Dialogue on Ganga”, was supposed “to facilitate interaction with various stakeholders”, “to discuss the issues & solutions to the task of Ganga Rejuvenation”, “to prepare road map for preparation of a comprehensive plan”. The website said the Ganga is “holiest of Rivers”, “purifier of mortal beings” & “living godess”, but now “seriously polluted” and in “extreme environmental stress”.

Where is the dialogue? However, the way the meeting was organized, there was essentially no dialogue. After the inaugural plenary session, the participants were divided among four groups: 1. spiritual leaders, 2. environmentalists, NGOs, water conservationists, 3. scientists, academicians and technocrats, and administrators; 4. public representatives.

I went to the second group and there, when someone pointedly asked, if there is any representative of the government present, there was no response! In fact it was positively shocking that the first panel member that spoke in this group was Dr Arun Kumar of AHEC (Alternate Hydro Energy Centre) whose work on Ganga basin cumulative impact assessment is so discredited that even the official agencies like the Expert Appraisal Committee of MoEF, the Inter-ministerial Group on Ganga, the Expert Body appointed by the Supreme Court after the June 2013 flood disaster and the Supreme Court itself has criticized it or found it unreliable. NMCG has discredited itself by appointing such a person to give an overview of achievement of Ganga Action Plans.

GM stage

Ms Bharti apologized in the beginning for hurriedly-called meeting. But the least she could have ensured was a credible process that will ensure that the officials have to show application of mind to the various suggestions received and conduct of the meeting in credible and confidence inspiring way. But the meeting did not inspire confidence that there will be any credible process that will ensure that there is application of mind to the various inputs given. Many of the participants did not have any opportunity to speak.

Recommendations for the government on Ganga

1. Make an honest effort to learn from the past. Why have the efforts of last 40 years since the passage of Water Pollution Act 1974 not helped Ganga? Similarly why did the GAP I, NRCP, GAP II, NGBRA not helped make the Ganga clean (nirmal) or perennial (aviral)?

2. Understand & recognise that Ganga is a river and what are the essential characteristics of a Ganga that it needs to rejuvenate it as a river. At Ganga Manthan, in post lunch session in the room where the fourth group for public representatives was sitting, I was sitting next to an official of Ministry of Water Resources and I casually asked him does the ministry of water resources understand what is a river? He first said yes, but when I said you are only dealing with water and nowhere in your work have we seen any value for rivers, he said ok, but we can do it in collaboration with MoEF. The trouble is, even MoEF does not understand rivers. [It was also strange to see in this session Mr Madhav Chitale (former Water Resources Secretary) describing Tennessee Valley Authority of 1933 as an effort to clean the river! Such misrepresentation going unchallenged was shocking.] It should be remembered that it is this ministry of water resources through which Sushri Uma Bharti has to achieve a rejuvenated Ganga!

3. Ganga is not 2525 km long river: We kept hearing this sentence that Ganga is 2525 km length of river and Mr Bhurelal in fact said we need to limit ourselves to discussing how to make this stretch clean. The trouble is, if the tributaries are not healthy rivers, how can the main stem of Ganga be rejuvenated? As Manoj Misra of Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan said, Ganga is not 2525 km, but much more than 25000 km including all the tributaries, as Yamuna is not 1400 km long but 13470 km long including all the tributaries.

4. Ganga in Mountains: Learn the lessons from Uttarakhand disaster, that affected the headwaters of the Ganga river. The Expert body constituted by the MoEF under Dr Ravi Chopra has a lot to say there. Revisit all the existing, under construction and planned projects in the whole basin.

5. Farakka barrage: It is well known that the barrage did not serve the basic purpose it was created for, namely making the Kolkata port navigable. But it has created such havoc in upstream and downstream for millions of people that some of the Bihar MPs of previous Lok Sabhas talked about decommissioning of the barrage in the debate on Ganga. But this government wants to make many more barrages! First do a post facto assessment of the Farakka barrage and its current costs, benefits and risks.

6. Formulate an Urban Water Policy: The footprint of the urban areas on the rivers is increasing in multiple ways, but we have no urban water policy. Some key elements that such a policy will include: Reducing transmission & Distribution losses, water audit from RWA upwards, Rainwater harvesting, decentralised and eco-friendly ways of sewage treatment and recycle, groundwater recharge and bottom up management, demand side management, protection of local water bodies, protection of riverbeds, floodplains and forest areas & democratisation of the Urban water utilities.  As the working report for the 12th Five Year Plan on Urban water said, no Urban areas should be allowed to have external water till they exhaust their local potential, including recycling of the treated  sewage and other demand side and supply side options. The footprint of the urban areas will increase exponentially if we do not urgently on this front.

7. Agriculture is the biggest user of water and our government encourages use of chemicals and pesticides in agriculture. Most of these chemicals end up in water bodies including rivers. If we do not want our rivers to be dumping grounds for these chemicals, the government should encourage organic farming. Similarly, in stead of encouraging water intensive cropping patterns and methods, government needs to encourage low water use crops and methods like System of Rice Intensification (SRI). SRI is applicable for many crops and can reduce water need by upto 50% and yet increase yields and incomes of farmers. But the government has shown no interest in encouraging SRI. Such methods can free up a lot of water for the river. Similarly, under the influence of powerful sugar lobby, we are producing more sugarcane and sugar than we need and than we are exporting the same at subsidized rates! So essentially we are exporting water at huge subsidized rates, that too from Ganga, but we have no water for the river!

8. Irrigation is the biggest user of water. At Bhimgoda, Bijnor and Narora barrages, we are diverting almost all the water in the river for irrigation. But we have no water for the river. If we change our water resources development and agriculture policies, it is possible to restrict these diversions to 50% and release the rest for the river. We need to review all this.

9. The IIT consortium report is seriously flawed and is not likely to help the river.

10. We need to define the path of the riverbed or right of way for the river, based on its need to carry 100 year flood and silt. In absence of such a defined space for the river, there are a lot of encroachments. There is also no river regulation law to regulate this riverways land. This is urgently required.

11. Our Pollution Control Boards and related mechanism is not known to have achieved a single clean river or nala in 40 years of their existence, anywhere in the country. This is because of the completely non transparent, unaccountable, non participatory and exclusive bodies, where people whose lives are affected by the pollution have no role. A complete revamp of this is required to make its management inclusive from block level upwards, and answerable to the local people through clearly defined management system.

12. One of the major reason for the failure of the GAP, NRCP and NGBRA is that their functioning is top down, with absolutely no clearly defined norms for transparency, accountability, participation and inclusive management. Unless we completely change this, no amount of money, no amount of technology, no amount of infrastructure or institutions is going to help the Ganga. We need management system for every STP, every freshwater plant, every city and town, every 3-5 km of the river, every tributary and so on. At least 50% members of the management committees for each of them should be from outside the government, including community members. The people whose lives and livelihoods depend on river including fisherfolk, boatspeople, river bed cultivators, local sand miners, communities depending on river for different water needs have to be represented in such management system. That will also create an ownership in river rejuvenation effort. This is also applicable to urban areas and all the tributaries.

13. This is also true for our environmental governance of dams, hydropower projects, flood control projects, water supply projects, and so on. Today there is no credible environmental management at planning, appraisal, construction, operation or decommissioning stage.

14. River of course needs water. Urgently. Chart out a road map to achieve 50% of freshwater releases from all dams and barrages in two years. Also no sewage water or effluents entering the river in two years.

In the concluding plenary, after listening to the reports from four groups (there were a lot of positive and useful suggestions there), Ms Uma Bharti and Mr Gadkari said that they won’t make any announcement today but they will ensure that the good suggestions that have come will be given to the decision-makers who will create a road map. This is very vague and unconvincing process with no credible transparency. The least the ministers could have assured is a confidence-inspiring process that would transparently ensure that the decision makers have applied their minds to the suggestions. But even that was not promised.

Despite this seemingly gloomy outcome, considering that the NMCG has invited[9] suggestions even after the meeting, I am going to send this blog link to them and wait for their response! Ganga definitely needs a lot of sewa from all of us if the river is to have any better future.

Himanshu Thakkar (ht.sandrp@gmail.com)

END NOTES:

[1] For details, see: http://www.gangamanthan.in/

[2] Union Minister of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation

[3] Union Minister of Road Transport & Highways, Shipping, Rural Development, Panchayati Raj, Drinking Water & Sanitation

[4] It’s worth noting here that Mr Gadkari seems to have abiding faith in technology, he said that this is an age of technology and there are technological solutions for all problems! This possibly shows where we are heading!

[5] Title: “Development of River Ganga for Tourism, Transport and to make it Environment Friendly”

[6] PIB PR on July 7, 2014; http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/ganga-clean-up-may-cost-rs-80-000-crore-114070700889_1.html

[7] http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/plan-for-navigation-in-ganga-basin-questioned/article6187510.ece

[8] http://moef.nic.in/sites/default/files/ngrba/index.html

[9] NMCG would welcome any further suggestions, ideas, write-up etc from all interested person through email: info@gangamanthan.in

[10] Also the views of NGBRA expert member B D Tripathi that also questions Dr Vinod Tare and IIT consortium report on Ganga: http://www.thenewsminute.com/technologies/72

http://www.thenewsminute.com/technologies/71: Ganga clean up more about governance than technology: Himanshu Thakkar

http://www.thenewsminute.com/technologies/70: Experts flay Uma Bharti’s Ganga Manthan clean up plan

13 Comments on “Will this Ganga manthan help the River?

  1. ‘….Ganga needs a lot of sewa from all of us, if the river is to have a better future.’ The last sentence of your report carries lot of meaning. How are we going to do it is a major question. My thinking is that if the local bodies and people are able to clean the storm water drains in their areas, the rivers will automatically become cleaner.

    Like

  2. There were a number of people from West Bengal and Jharkhand at the conference (mind you, these were all duly invited people and not some gatecrashers or arm chair experts sitting in far away places like Delhi and commenting based on secondary information) and ALL had nothing but horror tales to share on the adverse environmental and social impact wrought by the Farakka barrage on regions and people both upstream and downstream of it. And as Himanshu ji informs in his blog, that the Farakkha barrage has not even fulfilled its basic objective of making the river in Kolkata navigable and restoring the Kolkata port?

    So why was and to benefit whom (certainly not the local people, both in India and Bangladesh; or the local environment) was the Barrage created in the first place?????

    And if that was not enough, then now there is a talk (truly sheikh chilli pattern) to create not one more barrage but one after every 100 km of the river from Allahabad till Haldia, and dredge the river, with a dream to create a Panama canal like scenario in the river. While nothing on this plan is in public domain but the Hon’ble Minister has at least on four occasions (that I have personally been witness to) mentioned about it and that some Dutch engineers are advising the Ministry on it.

    If there ever were a true representation of a popular hindi saying ‘Ulti Ganga Bahana’ (reverse the flow of Ganga) then it is this. There is hardly anything in the name of plans for Ganga rejuvenation by the new Ministry of Ganga Rejuvenation, with the yesterday’s Conference being supposedly the first step in such a planning process, but a Rs 6000 crore project (about which public knows almost nothing) is already with the World Bank for appraisal????

    We would also like to know if such a proposal is part of the recommendations of the 7 IIT consortium that have been busy preparing a Ganga Rejuvenation Plan for almost 5 years now at huge cost to the public exchequer????? And if Not then what makes this project such a huge priority with the new government?

    We would also like to know if the environmental and social costs of this project been assessed by anyone, because MoEF shall not be bothered with potentially huge environmentally and socially disrupting project as this since in its own strange wisdom a structure on a river which do not have either a hydro-power or an irrigation component has presumably no environmental and social impact/s and thus require no prior assessment under the EIA Notification 2006.

    Above everything else, would somebody explain as to how would this project rejuvenate and not further compromise, pollute and kill the river Ganga, even in the stretch where till now there is some semblance of a river due to the contributions from the later tributaries meeting the river ??????

    manoj misra

    Like

  3. Namaste Bhaisaheb

    Nadio k naam pr kamane aur karz badane kee yeh prkriya kaise ruke ? Yeh gambhi prshn hai.

    Jab tak Ganga aur any nadio ki nirmata k liye jor budget pr rahega, Nadio k liye zaroori kathor nitigat nirnay sambhav dikhai nahin dete.

    Vice Chairman, Planning Commission – Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia nae IIT Kanpur dwara NGRBMP pr raishumaari k daurn pichhlae saal yahi irada zahir kiya tha. WATER SUPPLY MAIN VIRODH HAI TOE HUM WASTE MAIN PPP LAYENGE,

    Campany chahe desi ho ya videshi, vah usi prstaav ko aage badayedi jisme usae aaj bhi behisaab munafa milae aur kal bhi.
    Yeh tabhi sambhav ho sakta hai jab Ganga aaj bhi malin rahe aur kal bhi.
    World Bank es naye mauke pr punja gadaye baida hai.
    BEEMAR GANGA SAE PAISA KAMANE MAIN BHI VYAPARI KO PARHEJ NAHI HAI.
    Uski tyari poori hai.

    Ganga PUrnorddhar Mantralay chahkar bhi Ganga jee k liye kuchh behtar kr sake, eska zazba philhal Uma jee main dikhai nahin deta.
    Gadkari jee, Javedkar jee vah krne nahin denge.

    GANGA PHIR EK CORPORATE AGENDA HAI.
    NGO AGENDA YEH PAHLE SAE HAI HI.
    YEH PUBLIC AGENDA KAISE BANE ?

    Yeh sambhav kr dikhana ab zyada mahtavpurn maloom hota hai.
    Kya main theek soch raha huin ?

    Aapka arun

    Like

    • Many thanks, Aruj ji,

      I totally agree with you. Ganga does not seem to have chance of improvement in immediate future, till it becomes a public issue and it does not seem it will become that soon. Let us hope it does.

      Himanshu

      Like

  4. If rivers to be made pollution free, first thing the government must do is change the agriculture system — as they generate non-point source pollution –. That is going back to traditional system of agriculture. Second issue is on point source pollution. First remove all those industries in the river catchments or river banks — they rarely treat their solid and liquid wastes and thus not only surface water but also groundwater are contaminated –. Secondly, the domestic sewage — first stream line the drains that carry rain water and sewage water. Treat the sewage locally and try to use locally before sending the excess in to rivers. But unfortunately, the point source pollution treatments require power and thus they try to dump untreated waste in to water bodies. Pollution control boards get their mamools and just watch while the water bodies are contaminated. Unfortunately, here even judiciary is giving help hand to such unscrupulous people.

    With all these problemsgovernment wants spend around one lakh crore rupees towards rejuvenate river Ganga to share the money and give licenses to friendly businessmen to run the show under the disguise of transport & tourism, etc. This is a high cash political game. Let these politicians come up with a plan to clean local tanks and nallahs first and then talk of rivers.

    Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

    Like

  5. Thank you for going through and analyzing the material provided at Ganga Manthan and also proving in-depth and open feedback. The whole purpose of Ganga Manthan was to bring forward such feedback from the stakeholders and we are happy to see a number of suggestions from experts like you. Your recommendations like formulation of urban water policy, defining river regulation zones, achieving 50% freshwater releases from dams and barrages are very relevant to National Mission for Clean Ganga. We would like to take this discussion forward with a meeting at National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) at your convenient time. You suggestions and feedback are of immense value and may go a long way in rejuvenation of river Ganga.

    Like

    • Many thanks, NMCG friends,

      For this positive feedback. This is really appreciable. I would be happy to come to NMCG whenever you want, pl write to me at ht.sandrp@gmail.com. However, my suggestions are with you and it would be great if you were to share your detailed feedback.

      Best wishes,
      Himanshu Thakkar

      Like

  6. Himalaya bachega, ganga bachegi means central government should make Himalaya policy the Himalayan community given a suggestive document known as Himalaya peoples policy for pressurizing for strong Himalaya niti
    Suresh Bhai
    Uttarkhand
    9412077896

    Like

  7. Some of the key issues which I found after going through the article-
    1. Despite knowing the fact that technology is not a major concern,rather it is the poor governance, the task has been allotted to the IIT Consortium who are not considered to be the masters of governance.The consequence of the same was visible in the Farakkha Barrage case where the motive of establishment was not served and locals had horrific tales to say.Some other alternatives can be drawn here like role of NGOs and local government in establishing governance.

    2.The other point is the whole dichotomy of Ganga as a ‘river’ and a ‘water resource’.Work needs to be done on the multiple tributaries that are connected to the river for which people’s awareness,participation of local administration,taking strict actions like imposition of fines and penalties.

    Like

  8. Hi all,

    Some key issues and suggestions which I would like to add with Vishal’s points are

    1. Belonging from Patna, which is situated on the southern bank of the Ganges . This city also straddles the rivers Sone, Gandak and Punpun, but difference in the affection towards the river Ganges and these rivers can be easily seen. So some focus should be given to the point number 12 in the article which states that at least 50% members of the management committees for each of them should be from outside the government, including community members. The people whose lives and livelihoods depend on river including fisherfolk, boatspeople, river bed cultivators, local sand miners, communities depending on river for different water needs have to be represented in such management system.

    2. Second point which I would like to add is that as we know that the Ganga Action Plan was a program launched in April 1986 in order to reduce the pollution load on the ganga. But the efforts to decrease the pollution level in the river became more after spending Rs 9017 million Therefore, this plan was withdrawn on 31 March 2000. So before starting any action , proper road map should be made as suggested in the article,

    3. And the discussion is on Ganga Rejuvenation not on how to make a perfect Dam, so forming a consortium of seven IITs doesn’t give much value and even more they have already taken almost five years.

    Like

  9. Greenlco launch campaign ‘HAMAARI YAMUNA’ (Lifeline DELHI ki) 5th June 2015 on World Environment Day, Dilli Haat Janakpuri New Delhi

    Hamm Sabko Yamuna Ko apne ghar se bachane ki koshish karni chahiye! khali naaron se bhashnno se Yamuna Ji Saaf or nirmal nahi rehne wali.

    Aaiye is mission main ham sab pryaas kare ek jut ho kar dilli ke har koine se gande pani or rain water harvesting per kaam kare

    Kapil Kishore Saxena
    Greenlco Eco Foundation
    09811441526

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: